World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Performance Based Research Fund

Article Id: WHEBN0003659649
Reproduction Date:

Title: Performance Based Research Fund  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Research Quality Framework, University of Otago, Auckland University of Technology, Lincoln University (New Zealand), QS World University Rankings
Collection: Research in New Zealand, Research Management
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Performance Based Research Fund

The Performance Based Research Fund (PBRF) is a

  • Performance Based Research Fund

External links

  1. ^
  2. ^


  • Note: the number of staff and the quality score are weighted for full-time equivalents.
  • The national average includes non-university TEOs.
  • The 2012 rankings use the ‘new’ Average Quality Score, which excludes all R rated portfolios, whereas the 2003 and 2006 rankings use the previous Average Quality Score.

Rank University 2012 Quality score 2006 Quality score 2003 Quality score
1 Victoria 5.51 3.83 3.39
2 Auckland 5.12 4.19 3.96
3 Otago 4.96 4.23 3.23
4 Canterbury 4.79 4.10 3.83
5 Waikato 4.53 3.73 2.98
6 Massey 4.31 3.05 2.11
7 Lincoln 4.02 2.97 2.56
8 AUT 3.59 1.86 0.77
National average 4.66 2.96 2.59

PBRF rankings of New Zealand universities:

In 2012, Victoria University of Wellington was ranked first for research quality. The current research rankings are below. [2]

New Zealand universities

In assessing individuals rather than groups, PBRF differs from the otherwise similar Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the United Kingdom.

From 2006 two new categories, C(NE) and R(NE) were introduced, for new and emerging researchers who have not yet had the benefit of a full six year census period. Each staff member is assigned a numerical grade (in 2006 5 for an A, 3 for a B, 1 for a C or C (NE), and 0 for R and R (NE)). This is used to calculate an overall score. Since the numerical scores assigned for the 2003 assessment and that for the 2006 assessment differed, the results of the two assessments are not entirely comparable, despite the 2006 assessment being designed to be a partial round.

Each academic staff member is required (with some exceptions) to submit an Evidence Portfolio which records their research outputs, contribution to research environment, and peer esteem. They are then assessed as A, B, C or R category. The A indicates international standing, B national, C local and R research inactive or active at a lower level.

Each Quality Evaluation assesses the quality of research conducted at TEOs, and funding is allocated accordingly. Quality is determined by an assessment of research degree completion numbers, the amount of external research funding an institution achieves, and an evaluation of the individual research performance of all academic staff teaching on degrees or employed to conduct research.

The major element, the Quality Evaluation, is held periodically. The first was held in 2003, the second, a partial round in which not all staff were required to submit portfolios, was held in 2006, and the latest full round was held in 2012.

Quality evaluation


  • Quality evaluation 1
  • New Zealand universities 2
  • References 3
  • External links 4
  • reward and encourage the quality of researchers—60 percent of the fund
  • reflect research degree completions—25 percent of the fund
  • reflect external research income—15 percent of fund

The PBRF model has three elements to:


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.