World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Garner v. Louisiana

Article Id: WHEBN0034606187
Reproduction Date:

Title: Garner v. Louisiana  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Thurgood Marshall, African-American Civil Rights Movement, Joseph E. Boone, William Holmes Borders, History of the United States (1945–64)
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Garner v. Louisiana

Garner v. Louisiana
Argued October 18–19, 1961
Decided December 11, 1961
Full case name John Burrell Garner, et al. v. State of Louisiana, Mary Briscoe, et al.
Citations 368 U.S. 157 (more)
82 S. Ct. 248; 7 L. Ed. 2d 207; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 28
Prior history Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana
The convictions were so totally devoid of evidentiary support as to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Warren, joined by unanimous
Concurrence Frankfurter
Concurrence Douglas
Concurrence Harlan
Laws applied
United States Constitution, Amendment XIV

Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 (1961),[1] was a pivotal civil rights case argued by Thurgood Marshall before the Supreme Court. On December 11, 1961, the court unanimously ruled that Louisiana could not convict peaceful sit-in protesters who refused to leave dining establishments under the state's "disturbing the peace" laws.[2]


African-American students from Southern University sat at a "whites only" segregated lunch bar at Sitman's Drugstore in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The management summoned the Police after the students quietly remained despite being asked to relocate to another counter. After ordering the black patrons to leave, the Police arrested them and charged them with disturbing the peace, claiming that their behavior could "foreseeably disturb or alarm the public," according to the state's "disturbing the peace" statute.[3]

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People defended the student demonstrators as did the Kennedy administration's Justice Department, which filed a legal brief on their behalf.[4]

Opinion of the Court

In a 9-0 decision, the court ruled in the African-American students' favor, arguing the state violated due process of law under the 14th amendment and finding there was no evidence the students' behavior could have foreseeably disturbed the peace. In his written opinion, Justice John Marshall Harlan likened sit-in demonstrations to verbal expression as a form of free speech.[5] Justice William O. Douglas in his concurring opinion said, “For the police are supposed to be on the side of the Constitution, not on the side of discrimination. Yet if all constitutional questions are to be put aside and the problem treated merely in terms of disturbing the peace, I would have difficulty in reversing these judgments. I think, however, the constitutional questions must be reached and that they make reversal necessary.” [6]

Garner v. Louisiana was an important case for the Civil Rights movement, and one of many civil rights cases argued before the Warren Court (1953-69). Eventually, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce."


  1. ^ "Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 (1961)". FindLaw. Retrieved 2012-02-27. 
  2. ^ "1961 Supreme Court of the United States [Garner v. Louisiana] :: Southern University and A&M College" (PDF/HTML). 1961-07-17. his.1961.fou113.pdf. Retrieved 2012-07-17. 
  3. ^ "No Evidence to Support a Conviction. The Supreme Court's Decisions in Thompson v. City of Louisville and Garner v. Louisiana". University of Pennsylvania Law Review 110 (8): 1137–1146. June 1962.   (subscription required)
  4. ^ Geer, J. G., W. J. Schiller, et al. (2011). Gateways to Democracy: An Introduction to American Government, Wadsworth Pub Co.
  5. ^ "First Amendment Timeline" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-11-03. 
  6. ^ Garner v. Louisiana. 368 U.S. 157. Supreme Court of the United States. 1961.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.