World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

William Treanor

Article Id: WHEBN0004392231
Reproduction Date:

Title: William Treanor  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: ConkShankboneCarterTreanor.JPG, Fordham University School of Law, Hollingsworth v. Virginia, Sweatt v. Painter, Robert L. Carter
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

William Treanor

William Treanor
William Michael Treanor (born November 16, 1957) is an attorney and legal scholar. He is the dean of Fordham University School of Law, and an expert on constitutional law, having twice been cited in Supreme Court opinions. He continues to teach as a professor. Treanor held several high-profile government positions and he is an advocate of civil service. His teaching and work evidence Treanor's commitment to his philosophy of a complete legal education: "Intellectual excellence, the craft of lawyering, and dedication to public service."[1]

Contents

  • Personal 1
  • Dean of Fordham Law School and Georgetown Law 2
  • Civil Service 3
  • Constitutional law scholar 4
  • Quotes 5
  • 6 Selected articles
  • References 7

Personal

Treanor graduated summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Yale College in 1979. He obtained an M.A. in history from Harvard University in 1982. He then entered Harvard Law School, but transferred to Yale Law School because he felt they focused more on public service.[2] He was Article and Book Review Editor of the Yale Law Journal and graduated with a J.D. in 1985.

On October 15, 1994, Treanor married Allison Derivaux Ames, who was then director of strategic planning for corporate publicity and special events at Saks Fifth Avenue in New York City. He now has two children, Liam and Katherine.[3]

Dean of Fordham Law School and Georgetown Law

Treanor's biggest commitment remains to legal scholarship. "William Treanor represents a new generation of scholars and teachers at Fordham's School of Law," said the Rev. Joseph A. O'Hare, S.J., president of Fordham University at the time of Treanor's appointment.[4] When he first arrived to teach at Fordham in 1991, he evidenced his broad command of legal subjects in courses such as property, land use, intellectual property, constitutional law, criminal law, and legal history. In 1998, he went on leave from the university to serve as deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, before he returned to assume his current position in 2002.

"As dean of the law school, you're required to do both broad-level thinking and strategic planning," said Treanor in regard to challenges as a law dean.[5] On July 17, 2006, Treanor announced to students and faculty that the school surpassed the $20 million mark for new gifts and pledges. This was in stark contrast to the levels reached in 2004 ($4.2 million) and 2005 ($6.9 million). The funds will help establish six new chairs and start the Feerick Center for Social Justice and Dispute Resolution, named in honor of Treanor's predecessor, John Feerick.[6]

Plans for a new skyscraper were unveiled to accommodate increasing enrollment numbers, and the school ranks fifth in the country in placing its graduates at top-shelf law firms.[7] But Treanor is not just concerned with growth and reputation. Like the law deans of Harvard (which built a state-of-the-art law student gym, limited class size to 80 students, and mandated individualized written feedback for every student in every course throughout the semester), and Yale (which abandoned the traditional law school grading system, does not rank its students, and has only one semester of required classes), Treanor has attempted to address the students' quality of life.[8] In a 2006 interview, Treanor reported instituting free cupcakes and ice cream to alleviate the intensity of law school finals. Gifts to students, though, are in the offing: At the end of the 2006 academic year, Treanor worked for the purveyance of free flip-flops with Fordham's imprint on the bottom. "I feel obliged to make the Fordham experience for our students as special as possible," said Treanor.[2] Fordham maintains a strict grading curve policy, class rankings, and a year-long 1L curriculum.

On June 29, 2010, it was announced that Dean Treanor would become the new executive vice president and Dean of Georgetown University Law Center, beginning August 16, 2010.[9]

Georgetown Law
Since Treanor became dean at Georgetown Law, he has been featured in the following:
  • "The Transformation of Legal Education," DC Bar magazine, May 2011[10]
  • "Q&A: Georgetown Law Center's New Dean Discusses School's Steps to Help Students in a Time of Law Firm Cutbacks," The Washington Post, August 23, 2010[14]

In 2012, Treanor was named a "champion" by the National Law Journal,[15] one of the 25 "most influential in legal education" by the National Jurist[16] and a recipient of the Dave Nee Foundation's David S. Stoner Uncommon Counselor Award.[17]

Civil Service

Treanor's career in the public sector began as a speechwriter for Secretary of Education Shirley Hufstedler, followed by a clerkship for Judge James L. Oakes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. During the Iran-Contra Investigation, Treanor served as associate independent counsel. Later he became deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel, responsible for supplying advice to the White House and attorney general.

Constitutional law scholar

Treanor has been cited in Supreme Court opinions twice, including by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in his dissent in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.[18] He has written in-depth about some of the most controversial and complex turn of the 20th century constitutional law issues. He examined Congress' authority to define and declare war under the War Powers Clause. He focused on the original understanding of the Founders on the takings clause of the United States Constitution, also known as eminent domain in the United States. He wrote an article chronicling understanding of the scope of constitutional judicial review before Marbury v. Madison. He remains a prolific author of scholarly articles.

On June 6, 2006, he debated prominent classical liberal/libertarian law professor and published author Richard Epstein on the topic "Did Progressives Rewrite the Constitution?"

Quotes

  • "With Walsh or Starr, the president and his supporters could more easily argue that a prosecutor was overzealous or irresponsible, because there had been a three-judge panel that appointed him. With Fitzgerald, you have a prosecutor who was appointed by the deputy attorney general [at the direction of the attorney general]. The administration almost has to stand behind him because this is someone they selected themselves. It is harder to criticize someone you yourself put into play." [19]
  • "Few areas of constitutional law have produced as much heated debate as the war powers area, heat produced in no small part by the passionate belief that this is a subject of incalculable consequence. But, stunningly and ironically, there is little connection between the issues that scholars debate and the constitutional issues involving war that government officials and political leaders confront.[20]
  • "The original understanding of the Takings Clause was, very simply, that the federal government had to compensate the property owner when it physically took property --such as when it took land to build a fort. The clause did not require compensation for regulations under any circumstances."[21]
  • "Despite the public prominence of the property rights argument, there is actually nothing novel or particularly controversial about the conclusion that the Takings Clause was limited to physical seizures. With some notable exceptions, prominent legal scholars of all shades of political opinion—including such leading conservatives as former judge Robert Bork and former Solicitor General Charles Fried--support the conclusion that the property rights argument has no plausible foundation in the original understanding of the Takings Clause."[22]
  • "[Fordham Law School is] pleased to rank in the top five [in placing graduates at the most successful firms]. We focus our education on practicing the law as well as knowing the law, so firms have come to realize that our graduates are prepared to work effectively right from the start. And our location in Manhattan within walking distance of many of the country's elite firms assures that there are exceptional opportunities available for students."[23]
  • "This is a time of change for legal practice. The change in the economy precipitated changes that would have come inevitably…It does cause us to rethink how we prepare lawyers."[10]
  • "Georgetown is a law school with incredible strength, so both in the first year and longer term, what I see as my mission is to build on those strengths. We’ll be focusing on experiential learning, externships and increasing opportunities in those areas. We’re going to be focusing on the academic depth and intellect strengths of the law school and continue to build on that with new hires. I consider myself incredibly privileged to be here at this moment."[14]

Selected articles

References

  1. ^ Pranay Gupte, Activist Dean Lifts Fordham Law's Profile, The New York Sun, May 11, 2006, at Section 1, page 2
  2. ^ a b See, above, Gupte
  3. ^ "Weddings: Allison Ames, William Treanor", The New York Times, October 16, 1994.
  4. ^ "New Law School Dean", Fordham Law School press release, 2002.
  5. ^ See, above, Gupte.
  6. ^ "Law School Fundraising Surpasses $20 Million Mark", Fordham University press release, June 30, 2006.
  7. ^ David Dunlap, "Fordham Plans Expansion at Lincoln Center", The New York Times, May 23, 2005; "Fordham Law School Ranks Fifth for Placement at Top Paying Firms", Fordham Law School press release, May 23, 2006. Only Georgetown place more.
  8. ^ Meredith McKee, "1l Curriculum Changes Yielding Positive Results", Harvard Law Record, February 26, 2002
  9. ^ "New Law Center Dean Announced" "Georgetown University News"
  10. ^ a b Sarah Kellogg, "The Transformation of Legal Education", DC Bar magazine, May 2011
  11. ^ Karen Sloan, "Educators: Congress Needs Law Clerks", The National Law Journal, May 5, 2011
  12. ^ Christopher J. Gearon, "Law Schools Go Global", U.S. News & World Report, March 29, 2011
  13. ^ Leigh Jones, "No Humbugs Here", The National Law Journal, December 20, 2010
  14. ^ a b Amanda Becker, "Q&A: Georgetown Law Center's New Dean Discusses School's Steps to Help Students in a Time of Law Firm Cutbacks", The Washington Post, August 23, 2010
  15. ^ National Law Journal [1], July 9, 2012
  16. ^ National Jurist [2], November 28, 2012
  17. ^ Dave Nee Foundation website
  18. ^ See, above, Press Release, New Law School Dean.
  19. ^ Waas, Murray (February 9, 2006). "Cheney 'Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information". National Journal. Retrieved 2009-07-01. 
  20. ^ William Treanor, The War Powers Outside the Courts, 81 Indiana L.J. 1333 (2006).
  21. ^ Wiliam Treanor, The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause, Environmental Policy Project, Georgetown Environmental Law & Policy Institute.
  22. ^ Id.
  23. ^ See, above, Press Release, Fordham Law School Ranks Fifth for Placement at Top Paying Firms.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.