World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Wafd Party

Wafd Party
حزب الوفد
Historical leaders Saad Zaghlul Pasha
Mustafa el-Nahhas
Founded 1919 (1919)
Dissolved July 23, 1952 (1952-07-23)
Succeeded by New Wafd Party
(not legal successor)[1]
Headquarters Cairo, Kingdom of Egypt
Ideology Egyptian nationalism
Liberal conservatism
National liberalism
Political position Centre-right
International affiliation None
Colours      Green
Party flag
Politics of Egypt
Political parties

The Wafd Party ("Delegation Party"; Arabic: حزب الوفد‎, Hizb al-Wafd) was a nationalist liberal political party in Egypt. It was said to be Egypt's most popular and influential political party for a period from the end of World War I through the 1930s. During this time, it was instrumental in the development of the 1923 constitution, and supported moving Egypt from dynastic rule to a constitutional monarchy, where power would be wielded by a nationally-elected parliament.[2] The party was dissolved in 1952, after the 1952 Egyptian Revolution.


  • History 1
    • Rise 1.1
    • Government party 1.2
    • Decline 1.3
    • Failures of youth mobilization 1.4
    • Accommodation of the British presence 1.5
    • Dissilution 1.6
  • Electoral results 2
  • References 3
  • See also 4



The Wafd party was an Egyptian nationalist movement that came into existence in the aftermath of World War I. Though it was not the first nationalist group in Egypt, it had the longest lasting impact. It was preceded and influenced by smaller and less significant movements which evolved over time into the more modern and stronger nationalist Wafd Party. One of these earlier movements was the Urabi Revolt led by Ahmed Orabi in the early 1880s. This uprising was fought against the ruling powers of the Egyptian Khedive and European interference with Egyptian affairs. Saad Zaghloul, the future creator and leader of the Wafd Party, was a follower of Orabi, and participated in his revolution.

The actual party began taking shape during World War I. Saad Zaghloul began forming a group of individuals who shared his views, and did not include the assistance of the people. Saad Zaghloul and his contemporaries formed the Wafd (which literally means "delegation") near the end of the war. They presented themselves with Zaghloul as their representative to Reginald Wingate, the British governor in Egypt. They told Wingate that the main goal of the Wafd was the immediate termination of the British occupation of Egypt. This was what was originally told to the governor but he was not informed of their intention to use the Paris Peace conference to plead their case to the world powers. Zaghloul had created a delegation that involved representatives of most of the political and social groups of Egypt. Since it was full of so many different groups, it could not yet truly be considered a political party but more of a coalition. The Wafd had formed a constitution outlining the ways that they wish to govern Egypt.

The Wafd was denied its request to go to London and speak with the home government. They were not allowed to attend the Paris peace conference either. They counteracted this by publishing memos and giving speeches ensuring that the delegations in Paris would know what the real Egyptian delegation desired. Later, protests and statements led to the deportation of Saad Zaghloul and other key figures of the Wafd to the island of Malta. These deportations caused the opposite effect to that the British had hoped. Though they tried to keep it quiet, word spread and eventually led to a strike of law students. This strike became a demonstration with chants including "Long live Saad. … Long live Independence". This started the revolution of 1919 and in the following days many more began to strike and the government and courts shut down entirely. The British then released Saad Zaghloul and his followers to create a rift in the Wafd leadership. In reaction they further unified the party and the strikes continued.

The Wafd was now becoming a true party and one with complete support of the people. The delegation made its way to Paris only to hear that U.S. President Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Government party

The three-decade period between Britain's nominal exit in 1922 and the nationalist revolution of 1952 saw the erection of an uneasy balance of power between the [5] In the 1924 parliamentary election the Wafd won 179 of 211 parliamentary seats.[4] In 1936 it won 89% of the vote and 157 seats in Parliament.[4]

However, ties between the Wafd and the two other axes of power—the King and the Residency—were strained by the party's raison d'être of opposing British intervention in Egypt and the King's collusion therein. King Fuad I's relations with the Wafd were described as "cool,"[3] and ties between the unelected monarch and the largest political party further deteriorated after Fuad's son Farouk, who succeeded his father to the sultanate, signed an unduly quiescent treaty with the British in 1936. This alienated the party that had arisen primarily out of popular resentment of British control of Egypt and commanded popular support by associating itself most closely with the nationalist struggle for full Egyptian independence.


The power vacuum resulting from the end of the British mandate over Egypt also precipitated a severe welfare provision vacuum which the new government failed to fill. By the 1930s, Egypt became a top destination for

See also

  1. ^ "Brotherhood to run in Egypt polls".  
  2. ^ Osman, Tarek, Egypt on the Brink, by Tarek Osman, (Yale University Press, 2010), p. 26
  3. ^ a b Gibb, H.A.R. "The Situation in Egypt." International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931–1939), Vol. 15, No. 3 (May–June 1936), p. 354
  4. ^ a b c THE ERA OF LIBERAL CONSTITUTIONALISM AND PARTY POLITICS. The Rise and Decline of the Wafd, 1924–39
  5. ^ Gibb, 1936, p. 355
  6. ^ Carter, B.L. "On Spreading the Gospel to Egyptians Sitting in Darkness: The Political Problems of Missionaries in Egypt in the 1930s." Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4 (October 1984), pp. 18–36.
  7. ^ Carter, B.L. "On Spreading the Gospel to Egyptians Sitting in Darkness: The Political Problems of Missionaries in Egypt in the 1930s." Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4 (October 1984), p. 18
  8. ^ Deeb, Marius. "Labour and Politics in Egypt, 1919-1939." International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2 (May 1979), pp. 187–203.
  9. ^ Deeb, 1979, p. 188
  10. ^ Deeb, 1979, p. 199
  11. ^ Deeb, 1979, pp. 203
  12. ^ Jankowski, James P. "The Egyptian Blue Shirts and the Egyptian Wafd, 1935–1938." Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (January 1970), pp. 77–95
  13. ^ Munson, Ziad. "Islamic Mobilization: Social Movement Theory and the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood." The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 4 (Autumn 2001), p. 501
  14. ^ Jankowski, 1970, p. 79
  15. ^ Jankowski, 1970, p. 82
  16. ^ Jankowski, 1970, p. 85
  17. ^ Jankowski, 1970, p. 87
  18. ^ Munson, 2001, p. 495


House of Representatives
Election year # of
overall votes
% of
overall vote
# of
overall seats won
+/– Leader
1923–1924 unknown (#1)
188 / 215
Saad Zaghloul
1925 unknown (#1)
86 / 215
Saad Zaghloul
1926 unknown (#1)
150 / 215
Saad Zaghloul
1929 unknown (#1)
198 / 236
Mustafa el-Nahhas
1936 unknown (#1)
169 / 232
Mustafa el-Nahhas
1942 unknown (#1)
240 / 264
Mustafa el-Nahhas
1945 unknown (#3)
29 / 264
Mustafa el-Nahhas
1950 unknown (#1)
225 / 319
Mustafa el-Nahhas

Electoral results

The collapse of the widespread popular support once commanded by the Wafd has been historically attributed to the combined embattlements of three distinct trends in Egyptian politics of the pre-revolutionary era. The party, along with all other Egyptian political parties, was banned in January 1953 by Gamal Abdel Nasser following the Free Officers Revolution of 1952.


Easily the greatest factor contributing to popular disillusionment with the Wafd was the party's failure to boycott the Farouk government after it acceded to the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936. The policies followed by the party during the Anglo-Egyptian crisis of the mid-1930s alienated many Egyptian nationalists—heretofore the single most reliable support bloc for the Wafd—and severed the party between its small but powerful accommodationist minority and its large but voiceless resistant majority. The failure of the Wafd to more aggressively oppose the continuation of the British presence "left Egyptian politics devoid of a popularly legitimized leader or party."[18]

Accommodation of the British presence

After student demonstrations against the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty and the anti-labor policies of the government began to reveal cracks in the previously ironclad Wafd coalition, party leaders created a youth wing dubbed the "Blue Shirts."[14] However, rather than capitalizing on the grassroots nature of the youth movements, the party instead tried to slot the Blue Shirts onto their own rung in the top-down Wafd hierarchy, presenting members with uniforms, badges, and a standardized salute – all under the motto "Obedience & Struggle."[15] By June 1937, the Wafd feared that the Blue Shirts were becoming too militant, and thereafter further restricted their privileges.[16] Having never fully embraced youth mobilization, by the close of the 1930s the uneasy Wafd leadership had essentially abandoned any efforts at intergenerational coalition-building.[17]

During the 1920s, the party's leadership had placed very low emphasis on the recruitment and mobilization of youth.[12] Complacent in its dominant parliamentary position, the Wafd did not pursue innovative methods of youth organization until at least the mid-1930s, leaving it hopelessly behind future competitors such as the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, which had employed a far more effective local-franchising system since its inception in 1928.[13]

Failures of youth mobilization

Further social unrest resulted from the government's inability to resolve metastasizing labor disputes threatening the Egyptian economy. The twin occurrences of the worldwide recession prompted by the Great Depression and a regional cotton crisis slowed Egypt's GDP growth through the late 1920s and most of the following two decades.[8] The consequent instability in the labor market motivated early attempts at widespread unionization. Sensing a threat to its unrivaled power, the Wafd implemented numerous local labor conciliation boards,[9] which were essentially toothless owing to the dearth of labor laws on a national level. Though the Wafd secured guarantees of a permanent national labor council,[10] no significant labor laws were enacted; those that did gain passage were not enforced; and the Wafd was unable to effect any substantial change in the fiercely anti-union policy of the government.[11]

[7] consortia beseeched their sponsors "to make heavy sacrifices so that Egyptian children could have a better education than their own parents could afford"; likewise, the proliferation of missionary-operated hospitals exposed the inadequacy of government-provided healthcare.Proselytism Western [6]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.