World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Social liberalism

Article Id: WHEBN0000765430
Reproduction Date:

Title: Social liberalism  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: List of political parties in Spain, Liberalism, Democrats 66, History of liberalism, Politics of the Netherlands
Collection: Political Culture, Political Ideologies, Social Liberalism
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Social liberalism

Social liberalism is a political ideology that seeks to find a balance between individual liberty and social justice. Like classical liberalism, social liberalism endorses a market economy and the expansion of civil and political rights and liberties, but differs in that it believes the legitimate role of the government includes addressing economic and social issues such as poverty, health care, and education.[1][2][3] Under social liberalism, the good of the community is viewed as harmonious with the freedom of the individual.[4] Social liberal policies have been widely adopted in much of the capitalist world, particularly following World War II.[5] Social liberal ideas and parties tend to be considered centrist or centre-left.[6][7][8][9][10] The term social liberalism is used to differentiate it from classical liberalism, which dominated political and economic thought for several centuries until social liberalism branched off from it around the Great Depression.[11][12]

A reaction against social liberalism in the late twentieth century, often called neoliberalism, led to monetarist economic policies and a reduction in government provision of services. However, this reaction did not result in a return to classical liberalism, as governments continued to provide social services and retained control over economic policy.[13]

To be distinguished from this definition is the use of the term "social liberalism" in the context of American politics to describe progressive stances on socio-political issues like abortion, same-sex marriage or gun control, as opposed to "social conservatism". A social liberal in this sense of the term may hold either "liberal" or "conservative" views on fiscal policy.[14] (See Modern liberalism in the United States)


  • Origins 1
    • United Kingdom 1.1
    • Germany 1.2
    • France 1.3
    • United States 1.4
  • Implementation 2
    • United Kingdom 2.1
    • Germany 2.2
    • Rest of Europe 2.3
    • United States 2.4
  • Revival 3
  • Active social liberal parties and organizations 4
  • Historical social liberal parties and organizations 5
  • Notable social liberal thinkers 6
  • See also 7
  • Notes 8
  • References 9
  • Further reading 10


United Kingdom

By the end of the nineteenth century, the principles of industrialisation and laissez-faire capitalism came from conservatives concerned about social balance, although socialism later became a more important force for change and reform. Some Victorian writers—including Charles Dickens, Thomas Carlyle, and Matthew Arnold—became early influential critics of social injustice.[15]

John Stuart Mill contributed enormously to liberal thought by combining elements of classical liberalism with what eventually became known as the new liberalism. The new liberals tried to adapt the old language of liberalism to confront these difficult circumstances, which they believed could only be resolved through a broader and more interventionist conception of the state. An equal right to liberty could not be established merely by ensuring that individuals did not physically interfere with each other, or merely by having laws that were impartially formulated and applied. More positive and proactive measures were required to ensure that every individual would have an equal opportunity of success.[16]

In the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, a group of British thinkers, known as the New Liberals, made a case against laissez-faire classical liberalism and argued in favor of state intervention in social, economic, and cultural life. The New Liberals, which included intellectuals like T.H. Green, L.T. Hobhouse, and John A. Hobson, saw individual liberty as something achievable only under favorable social and economic circumstances.[6] In their view, the poverty, squalor and ignorance in which many people lived made it impossible for freedom and individuality to flourish. New Liberals believed that these conditions could be ameliorated only through collective action coordinated by a strong, welfare-oriented and interventionist state.[17]

The First World War. The comprehensive welfare state built in the UK after the Second World War, although largely accomplished by the Labour Party, was significantly designed by two Liberals: John Maynard Keynes, who laid the economic foundations, and William Beveridge, who designed the welfare system.[6]


In late nineteenth century Germany, left-liberals established trade unions in order to help workers improve working and economic conditions. Some liberal economists, such as Lujo Brentano or Gerhart von Schulze-Gävernitz, established the Social Policy Association in 1873 to promote social reform. But their ideas found relatively few supporters among the liberal politicians. The main objectives of the left-liberal parties were free speech, freedom of assembly, free trade, representative government, equal and secret suffrage, and protection of private property, although they were strongly opposed to the welfare state, which they called State Socialism. Later Friedrich Naumann, who maintained close contacts with Brentano and Schulze-Gävernitz, founded the National-Social Association, which attempted to combine bourgeois liberalism with proletarian socialism. The new group advocated, among other things, increased social welfare legislation, the right to strike, and profit-sharing in industry. Although the party was unable to win any seats and soon dissolved, the theories it developed would remain influential in German liberalism.

While some writers describe Germany's liberalism as social liberalism, others only apply the term to the policies of the National-Social Association. The main left-liberal parties in Germany were the German Progress Party during the German Empire and the German Democratic Party during the Weimar Republic. The Free Democratic Party represents liberalism in modern Germany. The term left-liberal contrasted these parties with the more conservative liberals, in particular the right-wing of the National Liberal Party, which allied itself with the Conservatives.[18][19][20]


In France, social liberal theory was developed in the Third Republic by solidarist thinkers, including Alfred Fouillée and Émile Durkheim, who were inspired by sociology and influenced radical politicians like Léon Bourgeois. They explained that a greater division of labor caused greater opportunity and individualism, but it also inspired a more complex interdependence. They argued that the individual had a debt to society, promoting progressive taxation to support public works and welfare schemes. However, they wanted the state to coordinate rather than to manage, and they encouraged cooperative insurance schemes among individuals. Their main objective was to remove barriers to social mobility rather than create a welfare state.[21]

United States

In the 1870s and the 1880s, the American economists Richard Ely, John Bates Clark, and Henry Carter Adams—influenced both by socialism and the Evangelical Protestant movement—castigated the conditions caused by industrial factories and expressed sympathy towards labor unions. None, however, developed a systematic political philosophy, and they later abandoned their flirtations with socialist thinking. In 1883, Lester Frank Ward published the two-volume Dynamic Sociology and formalized the basic tenets of social liberalism while at the same time attacking the laissez-faire policies advocated by Herbert Spencer and William Graham Sumner. The historian Henry Steele Commager ranked Ward alongside William James, John Dewey, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and called him the father of the modern welfare state.[22] Writing from 1884 until the 1930s, John Dewey—an educator influenced by Hobhouse, Green, and Ward—advocated socialist methods to achieve liberal goals. Some social liberal ideas were later incorporated into the New Deal,[23] which developed as a response to the Great Depression, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt came into office.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States, his New Deal domestic policies defined American liberalism for the middle third of the 20th century.


The welfare state grew gradually and unevenly from the late nineteenth century, but became fully developed following the Second World War, along with the mixed market economy. Also called "embedded liberalism", social liberal policies gained broad support across the political spectrum, because they reduced the disruptive and polarizing tendencies in society, without challenging the capitalist economic system. Business accepted social liberalism in the face of widespread dissatisfaction with the boom and bust cycle of the earlier economic system as it seemed to them to be a lesser evil than more left-wing modes of government. Social liberalism was characterized by cooperation between big business, government and labor unions. Government was able to assume a strong role because its power had been strengthened by the wartime economy. However, the extent to which this occurred varied considerably among Western democracies.[24]

United Kingdom

Leaflet, titled
British leaflet from the Liberal Party expressing support for the National Health Insurance Act of 1911. The legislation provided benefits to sick and unemployed workers, marking a major milestone in the development of social welfare.

The first notable implementation of social liberal policies occurred under the Chancellor of the Exchequer), Winston Churchill (as President of the Board of Trade) in addition to the civil servant William Beveridge.[25]

Most of the social democratic parties in Europe (notably including the British Labour Party) have taken on strong influences of social liberal ideology. Despite Britain's two major parties coming from the traditions of socialism and conservatism, most substantive political and economic debates of recent times were between social liberal and classical liberal concepts.[26]


Alexander Rüstow

, a German economist, first proposed the German variant of economic social liberalism. In 1932, speaking at the [27]

Following the Second World War, Rüstow's "neoliberalism", now usually called [27]

Rest of Europe

The post-war governments of other countries in Western Europe also followed social liberal policies. These policies were implemented primarily by Christian Democrats and Social Democrats, as liberal parties in Europe declined in strength from their peak in the nineteenth century.[28]

United States

American political discourse resisted this social turn in European liberalism. While the economic policies of the New Deal appeared Keynesian, there was no revision of liberal theory in favor of greater state initiative. Even though America lacked an effective socialist movement, New Deal policies often appeared radical and were attacked by the right. The separate development of modern liberalism in the United States is often attributed to American exceptionalism, which kept mainstream American ideology within a narrow range.[29]


John Rawls' principal work A Theory of Justice (1971) can be considered a flagship exposition of social liberal thinking, advocating the combination of individual freedom and a fairer distribution of resources. According to Rawls, every individual should be allowed to choose and pursue his or her own conception of what is desirable in life, while a socially just distribution of goods must be maintained. Rawls argued that differences in material wealth are tolerable if general economic growth and wealth also benefit the poorest.[30] A Theory of Justice countered utilitarian thinking in the tradition of Jeremy Bentham, instead following the Kantian concept of a social contract, picturing society as a mutual agreement between rational citizens, producing rights and duties as well as establishing and defining roles and tasks of the state. Rawls put the "equal liberty principle" in the first place, providing every person with equal access to the same set of fundamental (political) liberties; followed by the "fair equality of opportunity" and "difference principle" allowing social and economic inequalities under the precondition that privileged positions are accessible to everyone, that everyone has equal opportunities, and that even the least advantaged members of society benefit from this framework. This was later restated in the equation of Justice as Fairness. Rawls proposed these principles not just to adherents of liberalism, but as a basis for all democratic politics, regardless of ideology. The work advanced social liberal ideas immensely within 1970s' political and philosophic academia.[31] Rawls may therefore be seen as a "patron saint" of social liberalism.[26]

Following economic problems in the 1970s, social liberal thought underwent some transformation. Keynesian economic management was seen as interfering with the free market, while increased welfare spending that had been funded by higher taxes prompted fears of lower investment, lower consumer spending, and the creation of a "dependency culture." Trade unions often caused high wages and industrial disruption, while full employment was regarded as unsustainable. Writers such as Milton Friedman and Samuel Brittan, who were influenced by Friedrich Hayek, advocated a reversal of social liberalism. Their policies, which are often called neoliberalism, had a significant influence on Western politics, most notably on the governments of UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and US President Ronald Reagan, who pursued policies of deregulation of the economy and reduction in spending on social services.[13]

Part of the reason for the collapse of the social liberal coalition was a challenge in the 1970s from financial interests that could operate independently of national governments. Another cause was the decline of organized labor which had formed part of the coalition but was also a support for left-wing ideologies challenging the liberal consensus. Related to this was the decline of working class consciousness and the growth of the middle class. The push by the United States, which had been least accepting of social liberalism, for trade liberalization further eroded support.[32]

Active social liberal parties and organizations

In Europe, social liberal parties tend to be small or medium-sized centrist and centre-left parties.[33] Examples of successful European social liberal parties, which have participated in government coalitions at national or regional levels, are the Liberal Democrats in the United Kingdom, Democrats 66 in the Netherlands, and the Danish Social Liberal Party. In continental European politics, social liberal parties are integrated in the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) group in the European Parliament, which is the third biggest group at the parliament and includes both social liberal parties and market liberal parties.[34]

Giving an exhaustive list of social liberal parties worldwide is difficult, largely because political organisations are not always ideologically pure. Party ideologies often change over time. However, the following parties and organisations are usually accepted by peers[nb 1] or scholars as following social liberalism as a core ideology.

Historical social liberal parties and organizations

Notable social liberal thinkers

This list presents some notable scholars and politicians who are generally considered as having made significant contributions to the evolution of social liberalism as a political ideology:

See also




  • Adams, Ian. Political ideology today. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001. ISBN 0 7190 6019 2
  • De Ruggiero, Guido. The history of European liberalism. Boston: Beacon Press, 1959.
  • Faulks, Keith. Political sociology: a critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. ISBN 0 7486 1356 0
  • Feuchtwanger, E.J. Democracy and empire: Britain 1865-1914. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd., 1985. ISBN 0-7131-6162-0
  • Richardson, James L. Contending liberalisms in world politics. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 2001. ISBN 1-55587-915-2
  • Slomp, Hans. European politics Into the twenty-first century: integration and division. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2000. ISBN 0-275-96814-6


  1. ^ Rohr, Donald G. (September 1964). "The Origins of Social Liberalism in Germany".  
  2. ^ Gaus, Gerald and Courtland, Shane D. (Spring 2011). "'"The 'New Liberalism.  
  3. ^ John Derbyshire (12 July 2010). "The origins of social liberalism".  
  4. ^ The history of European liberalism (1959), Guido De Ruggiero, pp. 155–157
  5. ^ Fauks, Keith. Political Sociology: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, 1999, page 73
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Adams, Ian (2001). Political Ideology Today (Politics Today). Manchester:  
  7. ^ Slomp, Hans (2000). European Politics Into the Twenty-First Century: Integration and Division. Westport:  
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h Ortiz, Cansino; Gellner, Ernest; Geliner, E.; Merquior, José Guilherme; Emil, César Cansino (1996). Liberalism in Modern Times: Essays in Honour of Jose G. Merquior. Budapest: Central European University Press. 185866053X. 
  9. ^ Hombach, Bodo (2000). The politics of the new centre. Wiley-Blackwell.  
  10. ^ a b Richard E. Matland, Kathleen A. Montgomery (2003). Women's access to political power in post-communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  
  11. ^ a b c d Marks, Gary and Wilson, Carole (July 2000). "The Past in the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Response to European Integration" ( 
  12. ^ a b c d e f Richardson, James L. (2001). Contending Liberalisms in World Politics: Ideology and Power. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 155587939X. 
  13. ^ a b Fauks, Keith. Political Sociology: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, 1999, pages 71–75
  14. ^ Chideya, Farai (2004). The Red and the Blue: A Divided America. Trust: Reaching the 100 Million Missing Voters and Other Selected Essays (Soft Skull). p. 34. 
  15. ^ Richardson, pp. 36–37
  16. ^ Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (1999). Contemporary political ideologies. Continuum International Publishing Group.  
  17. ^ The Routledge encyclopaedia of philosophy, p.599
  18. ^ Contending liberalisms in world politics (2001) James L. Richardson, p. 37
  19. ^ Liberal Democrats in the Weimar Republic: The History of the German Democratic Party and the German State Party (1985) Bruce B. Frye, p 10
  20. ^ The Democratic Movement in Germany, 1789–1914 (1976) John L. Snell, p. 304-334
  21. ^ Contemporary political ideologies (1999) Roger Eatwell, Anthony Wright, pp. 35–36
  22. ^ Commager, Henry Steele, ed.; Lester Ward and the Welfare State. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967
  23. ^ Richardson, pp. 38–41
  24. ^ Richardson, pp. 137-138
  25. ^ Feuchtwanger, pp. 273-317
  26. ^ a b Andrew Vincent (2010). Modern Political Ideologies (Third ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 54. 
  27. ^ a b Oliver Marc Hartwich: Neoliberalism: The Genesis of a Political Swearword
  28. ^ Adams, p. 32
  29. ^ Contending liberalisms in world politics: ideology and power (2001), James L. Richardson, pp. 38–41 [2]
  30. ^ gary Browning (2000). Contemporary liberalism. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present (Sage). pp. 154–155. 
  31. ^ Edwin van de Haar (2015). Degrees of Freedom: Liberal Political Philosophy and Ideology. Transaction. 
  32. ^ Richardson, pp. 138-139
  33. ^ a b c d Kirchner, Emil (2000). Liberal parties in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 356–7.  
  34. ^ "ALDE National Delegations". ALDE Group in the European Parliament. 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010. 
  35. ^
  36. ^ James Walter (2010). What Were They Thinking?: The Politics of Ideas in Australia (Large Print 16pt). p. 430.  
  37. ^ European: Webster's Timeline History 1973–1977. John Wiley & Sons. 2009. p. 207.  
  38. ^ a b Dimitri Almeida (2012). The Impact of European Integration on Political Parties: Beyond the Permissive Consensus. Routledge. p. 107.  
  39. ^ Sejfija, Ismet (2013), "Analysis of Interviews with Representatives of Political Parties in Bosnia-Herzegovina" (PDF), Dealing with the Past in the Western Balkans. Initiatives for Peacebuilding and Transitional Justice in Bosnia- Herzegovina, Serbia and Croatia (Berghahn Foundation): 92 
  40. ^ Hloušek, Vít; Kopeček, Lubomír (2010), Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared, Ashgate, p. 117 
  41. ^ Saxonberg, Steven (2003), "The Czech road towards a consolidated democracy", The Road to the European Union (Manchester University Press) 1: 71 
  42. ^ a b Nordsieck, Wolfram. "Parties and Elections in Europe". Retrieved 2013-01-25. 
  43. ^ Madsen, Tomas Bech (Autumn 2007). "Radicalis and Liberalis in Denmark" (PDF). Journal of Liberal Democrat History. 
  44. ^ a b c Almeida, Dimitri. "Liberal Parties and European Integration" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-05-11. 
  45. ^ Elisabeth Bakke (2010). Central and East European party systems since 1989. Central and Southeast European Politics since 1989 (Cambridge University Press). p. 79.  
  46. ^ a b Vít Hloušek; Lubomír Kopeček (2010). Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 204.  
  47. ^ Udo Kempf (2007). Das politische System Frankreichs. Springer DE. p. 190.  
  48. ^ Movement genesis: social movement theory and the 1980s West German peace movement by Steve Breyman As quoted in the text: "The Liberal Democrats (Liberale Demokraten or LD) split from the FDP to create their own social-left liberal alternative."
  49. ^ Geoffrey Roberts (1997). Party Politics in the New Germany. p. 20.  
  50. ^ Michael Kaeding; Niko Switek (2015). Die Europawahl 2014: Spitzenkandidaten, Protestparteien, Nichtwähler. Springer-Verlag. p. 41.  
  51. ^ ALN Member Parties, PULS - Guinea
  52. ^ Globalization, democratization and development: European and Japanese views of change in South East Europe edited by Vojmir Franičević and Hiroshi Kimura. As quoted in the text: "Towards the end of the 1990s the social-liberal Minshuto (Democratic Party of Japan, DPJ) consolidated and replaced Shinshinto as a rival of LDP."
  53. ^
  54. ^
  55. ^
  56. ^
  57. ^
  58. ^ a b c Hans Slomp (2011). Europe, A Political Profile: An American Companion to European Politics: An American Companion to European Politics. ABC-CLIO. p. 425.  
  59. ^ Oyvind Osterud (2013). Norway in Transition: Transforming a Stable Democracy. Routledge. p. 114.  
  60. ^
  61. ^ Igor Guardiancich (2012). Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: From Post-Socialist Transition to the Global Financial Crisis. Routledge. p. 144.  
  62. ^ European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity
  63. ^ Anatoly Kulik; Susanna Pshizova (2005). Political Parties in Post-Soviet Space: Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, and the Baltics. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 27.  
  64. ^ David White (2006). The Russian Democratic Party Yabloko: Opposition in a Managed Democracy. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 2.  
  65. ^ The European Union Encyclopedia and Directory 1999. Psychology Press. 1999. p. 332.  
  66. ^ Dr Vít Hloušek; Dr Lubomír Kopecek (2013). Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 120.  
  67. ^
  68. ^ Grigsby, Ellen (2008). Analyzing Politics: An Introduction to Politics Science. Florence: Cengage Learning. pp. 106–7.  
  69. ^ Arnold, N. Scott (2009). Imposing values: an essay on liberalism and regulation. Florence: Oxford University Press. p. 3.  
  70. ^ Scott Lash (1987). The End of Organized Capitalism. Univ of Wisconsin Press. p. 27.  
  71. ^ Liesbeth van de Grift (2012). Securing the Communist State: The Reconstruction of Coercive Institutions in the Soviet Zone of Germany and Romania, 1944-1948. Lexington Books. p. 41.  
  72. ^ Hungary by Gábor Bátony
  73. ^ NSD, European Election Database, Iceland
  74. ^ Jörg Seißelberg (1995). "Berlusconis Forza Italia. Wahlerfolg einer Persönlichkeitspartei". In Winfried Steffani; Uwe Thaysen. Demokratie in Europa: Zur Rolle der Parlamente. Springer-Verlag. p. 209.  
  75. ^ Daniele Caramani (2013). The Europeanization of Politics. Cambridge University Press. p. 310.  
  76. ^ Dominique Auzias; Jean-Paul Labourdette; Collectif (2012). Vilnius 2012 (avec cartes et avis des lecteurs). Petit Futé. p. 22.  
  77. ^ Marek Jan Chodakiewicz (2012). Intermarium: The Land between the Black and Baltic Seas. Transaction Publishers. p. 331.  
  78. ^ Gebhard Moldenhauer (2001). Die Niederlande und Deutschland: einander kennen und verstehen. Waxmann Verlag. p. 113.  
  79. ^ Korean democratic party information
  80. ^ Lachner, Andreas (2006), "Das Parteiensystem der Schweiz", Die Parteiensysteme Westeuropas (VS Verlag): 400 
  81. ^ Stephen Driver (2011). Understanding British Party Politics. Polity. p. 117.  
  82. ^ Ian Adams (1998). Ideology and Politics in Britain Today. Manchester University Press. p. 63.  
  83. ^ a b c d e Cardoso Rosas, João (2008). "Socialismo ou liberalismo social?". Retrieved 2008-05-21. 
  84. ^ a b c d e  
  85. ^ a b c d e Meadowcroft, John (Autumn 2000). "The Origins of Community Politics" (PDF). Journal of Liberal Democrat History. 
  86. ^ a b c d Avital Simhony, David Weinstein (2001). The new liberalism: reconciling liberty and community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  
  87. ^ a b c "James Hobson". Retrieved 2008-05-19. 
  88. ^ Merquior, J.G. (1991). Liberalism Old and New. Boston: Twayne Publishers.  
  89. ^ Seidman, Steven (2004). Contested knowledge: social theory today. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.  
  90. ^ W. Russell, James (2006). Double standard: social policy in Europe and the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.  
  91. ^ Thompson, Alastair (2000). Left Liberals, the State, and Popular Politics in Wilhelmine Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  
  92. ^ F. Biagini, Eugenio (2002). Citizenship and Community: Liberals, Radicals and Collective Identities in the British Isles, 1865–1931. Cambridge: Published by Cambridge University Press. p. 228.  
  93. ^ Till van Rahden, Marcus Brainard (2008). Jews and Other Germans: Civil Society, Religious Diversity, and Urban Politics in Breslau, 1860–1925. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.  
  94. ^ Ronald Findlay, Lars Jonung, Mats Lundahl (2002). Bertil Ohlin: a centennial celebration, 1899–1999. Cambridge: MIT Press.  
  95. ^ Klausen, Jytte (2001). War and Welfare: Europe and the United States, 1945 to the Present. Palgrave Macmillan.  
  96. ^ "Espaço Cultural Miguel Reale". Jornal da Universidade de São Paulo (in Portuguese).  
  97. ^  
  98. ^ Watson, Graham (Spring 1998). "The Two Davids" (PDF). Journal of Liberal Democrat History. 
  99. ^ a b c Vincent, Andrew (2007). The Nature of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  
  100. ^ Paul Aron, Luke Miller (2007). "The Third Team: A brief history of the Australian Democrats after 30 years" (PDF). Australian Democrats. Retrieved 2009-04-05. 
  101. ^ Flach, Karl-Hermann (1984). Noch eine Chance für die Liberalen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer S. Verlag GmbH.  
  102. ^ Gotovac, Vlado (1996). In Defence of Freedom: Zagreb 1971–1996. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska; Croatian PEN Centre. p. 11.  
  103. ^ Rodriguez, Ángel Rivero (1993). "Liberalismo, democracia y pragmatismo" (PDF). Isegoría (8). 
  104. ^ a b c Verhofstadt, Dirk. "Liberalism is the best Cure for Poverty". Retrieved 2008-08-17. 
  105. ^  
  106. ^ Tosto, Milton (2005). The meaning of liberalism in Brazil. Lanham: Lexington Books.  
  107. ^  

Further reading

  • Martin, Keith D. (2010). A Liberal Mandate: Reflections on our Founding Vision and Rants on how we have Failed to Achieve it. Silver Spring, MD: Weit Press. ISBN 978-0-578-04365-4.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.