World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Democratic Socialists of America

Article Id: WHEBN0039596452
Reproduction Date:

Title: Democratic Socialists of America  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Socialist International, Party for Socialism and Liberation, Anti-capitalism, International League of Religious Socialists, Socialist Party of America
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Democratic Socialists of America

Democratic Socialists of America
Leader Maria Svart (Executive Director)
Founded 1982
Merger of Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee,
New American Movement
Headquarters 75 Maiden Lane, Ste 702
New York, NY 10038
Membership  (2014) 10,000
Ideology Democratic socialism
Political position Left-wing
International affiliation Socialist International
Politics of United States
Political parties

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is a United States and an affiliate of Socialist International, an international federation of social-democratic, democratic socialist and labor political parties and organizations.

DSA was formed in 1982 by a merger of the Socialist Party of America in 1972 when it changed its name to Social Democrats, USA.[1] NAM was a coalition of writers and intellectuals with roots in both the New Left movements of the 1960s and the former members of socialist and communist parties of the Old Left.

Initially the DSA consisted of approximately 5,000 ex-DSOC members and 1,000 ex-NAM members. Upon the DSA's founding, Michael Harrington and socialist-feminist author Barbara Ehrenreich were elected as co-chairs of the organization.

According to DSA national director Maria Svart, the group has its roots in the [3] They also support free higher education.[4]

Organizational history

The DSA was formed in 1982 after a merger between the [7]

At its start, DSOC had 840 members, of which 2 percent served on its national board; approximately 200 had previously had membership in Social Democrats, USA or its predecessors in 1973 when SDUSA stated its membership at 1,800, according to a 1973 profile of Harrington.[8]

In electoral politics, DSA, like DSOC before it, was very strongly associated with Michael Harrington's position that "the left wing of realism is found today in the Democratic Party." In its early years DSA opposed Republican presidential candidates by giving critical support to Democratic Party nominees like Walter Mondale in 1984.[9] In 1988, DSA enthusiastically supported Jesse Jackson's second presidential campaign.[10] DSA's position on US electoral politics states that "democratic socialists reject an either–or approach to electoral coalition building, focused solely on [either] a new party or on realignment within the Democratic Party."[11]

During the 1990s, DSA gave the Clinton administration an overall rating of C-, "less than satisfactory."[12]

The DSA's leadership believes working within the Democratic Party is necessary because of the nature of the American political system, which rarely gives third parties a chance politically. That said, DSA is very critical of the corporate-funded Democratic Party leadership.[13] The organization believes that

"Much of progressive, independent political action will continue to occur in Democratic Party primaries in support of candidates who represent a broad progressive coalition. In such instances, democratic socialists will support coalitional campaigns based on labor, women, people of color and other potentially anti-corporate elements... Electoral tactics are only a means for democratic socialists; the building of a powerful anti-corporate coalition is the end..."[14]

Electoral positions

In 2000, DSA took no official position on the presidential election, with several prominent DSA members backing Green Party presidential candidate Ralph Nader.

In 2004, the organization backed John Kerry after he won the Democratic nomination. In its official magazine the DSA's Political Action Committee declared:

"While we have no illusions about how a Kerry administration would govern — absent mass pressure from below — and are not impressed with his delayed criticism of the war and his earlier commitments in favor of 'free trade,' we also realize that the Bush administration is as reactionary as Reagan’s. A Kerry defeat would be taken not as a defeat of the US political center, which Kerry represents, but of the mainstream Left. As a result, it would embolden the Right and demoralize the Left (as well as trade unionists and people of color) as much as Reagan’s 1984 defeat of Mondale did. On the other hand, a Kerry victory will let us press onward, with progressives aggressively pressuring an administration that owed its victory to democratic mobilization from below."[15]

The only resolution on upcoming elections at the DSA's 2005 convention focused on [17]

In 2008, the DSA supported Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama in his race against Republican candidate John McCain. Following Obama's election, many on the right[18] began to allege that his administration's policies were "socialistic," a claim rejected by DSA and the Obama administration alike. The widespread use of the word "socialism" as a political epithet against the Obama government by its opponents caused National Director Frank Llewellyn to declare that "over the past 12 months, the Democratic Socialists of America has received more media attention than it has over the past 12 years."[19]

Membership size

Members march at the Occupy Wall Street protest on September 17, 2011

Membership in DSA is obtained through the payment of annual dues, which in 2010 range from a "low income and student" rate of $20 to a "sustainer" rate of $130, with a basic rate of $45.[20] Every member receives a paid subscription to the organization's quarterly newsletter, Democratic Left (commonly known as DL).[21] The organization also offers "family memberships" at the rate of $80, which include only one subscription to DL,[20] and sells subscriptions to the publication to non-members for $10 per year.[22]

When formed, the estimated membership was 5,000, after the merger with the [25] and three years later the DSA announced on its website that its membership had increased by some 13% since July 2003 as the result of a recent direct mail campaign.[26]

DSA does not release annual membership numbers, nor do officials of the organization state them with precision in the press. It does, however, publish annually its sworn declaration of "Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation" in its official magazine so as to qualify for subsidized postage rates from the United States Postal Service. In the 12 months previous to its 2009 declaration, the group indicates that Democratic Left had an average "Total Paid Distribution" of 5707 copies.

The "Total Paid Distribution" numbers of Democratic Left over recent years are as follows:

Year Average Total Paid Circulation Issue Where Statement Appears
2001 5,846 vol. 29, no. 3, pg. 15
2002 not published
2003 4,890 vol. 31, no. 3, pg. 2
2004 4,535 vol. 32, no. 3, pg. 2
2005 4,622 vol. 33, no. 3, pg. 15
2006 4,883 vol. 34, no. 3, pg. 3
2007 5,443 vol. 35, no. 3, pg. 3
2008 5,710 vol. 36, no. 3, pg. 3
2009 5,707 vol. 37, no. 3, pg. 3


DSA is organized at the local level, and works with New York City. As of 2006, the DSA website lists 24 chartered locals.

Governance of the DSA is by the group's National Political Committee, which, since 2001, has been a 16-person body.[27] The organization's constitution states that at least eight of the NPC's members shall be women and at least four members of "racial or national" minority groups.[28] A seventeenth vote is cast by the representative of the DSA's youth affiliate, the Young Democratic Socialists, who elect one male and one female delegate who split the vote. The NPC meets four times a year.[29]

The NPC elects an inner committee of six, including five of its own members and one representative of the youth section, called the "Steering Committee." At least two of these are constitutionally required to be women and at least one a "person of color," with the National Director and the Youth Section Organizer also participating as ex-officio members. This Steering Committee meets bimonthly, either in person or by conference call.[30] The DSA has a Religion and Socialism Commission, in which Cornel West has played a leading role. John Cort was a founding editor of the Commission's magazine, Religious Socialism.

DSA publishes Democratic Left, a quarterly newsletter of news and analysis. This publication continues in an uninterrupted run from the original Newsletter of the Democratic Left published by DSA forerunner the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee since its establishment in 1973. In 2008, DSA members active in the U.S. labor movement founded Talking Union, a blog that focuses on labor politics, working class struggles and strategies.[31]

Young Democratic Socialists (YDS) is the official youth section of Democratic Socialists of America. The YDS publishes a quarterly newsletter called The Red Letter and maintains an online blog called "The Activist".

National conventions

The highest decision-making authority of the organization is the organization's national conventions, which are held biannually. These gatherings of the organization are as follows:

Year Dates of Convention Location
2013 October 25–27 Emeryville, CA
2011 November 11–13 Vienna, VA
2009 November 13–15 Evanston, IL
2007 November 9–11 Atlanta, GA
2005 November 11–13 Los Angeles, CA
2003 November 14–16 Detroit, MI
2001 November 9–11 Philadelphia, PA
1999 November 12–14 San Diego, CA


The DSA's ideas are greatly influenced by those of writer Michael Harrington, Chairman of the League for Industrial Democracy (1964) and member of the National Executive Board of the Socialist Party of America (1960–68). Opposed to capitalism and communism alike as cruel and anti-libertarian social systems, Harrington advocated working for a realignment of the U.S. Democratic Party away from an amorphous amalgam of often contradictory ideas and toward a principled party of the left-wing politics.

Throughout his life, Harrington embraced the thinking of Karl Marx while rejecting the "actually existing" Communist systems of the Soviet Union, China, and Eastern Europe. Harrington said:[6]

"Put it this way. Marx was a democrat with a small D. The Democratic Socialists envision a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning...and racial equality. I share an immediate program with liberals in this country because the best liberalism leads toward socialism.... I want to be on the left wing of the possible."

Harrington made it clear that, even if the traditional Marxist vision of a marketless, stateless society was not possible, he did not understand why this needed to "result in the social consequence of some people eating while others starve."[32]

Before the collapse of the USSR, the DSA voiced opposition to that nation's bureaucratically managed economy and control over its satellite states.[33] The DSA welcomed Mikhail Gorbachev's reforms in the Soviet Union. Sociologist Bogdan Denitch wrote in DSA's Democratic Left:[34]

"The aim of democrats and socialists should help the chances of successful reform in the Soviet bloc... While supporting liberalization and economic reforms from above, socialists should be particularly active in contacting and encouraging the tender shoots of democracy from below".

Today, the organization issues few statements about overriding principles while frequently commenting on matters of public policy. One primary leaflet detailing the group's official ideas, "What is Democratic Socialism? Questions and Answers from the Democratic Socialists of America," states that while "no country has fully instituted democratic socialism," nonetheless there are lessons to be learned from "the comprehensive welfare state maintained by the Swedes, from Canada’s national health care system, France’s nationwide childcare program, and Nicaragua’s literacy programs".[35] The "tremendous prosperity and relative economic equality" established by the Social Democratic Parties of the countries of Scandinavia and Western Europe are lauded.[35]

See also


  1. ^
    • Anonymous (31 December 1972). "Socialist Party now the Social Democrats, U.S.A.". New York Times. p. 36. Retrieved February 8, 2010. 
    The New York Times reported on the Convention for three other days:
    • Anonymous (27 December 1972). "Young Socialists open parley; to weigh 'New Politics' split". New York Times. p. 25. 
    • Johnston, Laurie (28 December 1972). "Young Socialists defeat motion favoring recognition of Cuba". New York Times. p. 15. 
    • Anonymous (1 January 1973). Firmness' urged on Communists: Social Democrats reach end of U.S. Convention here"'". New York Times. p. 11. 
  2. ^ Maria Svart (November 7, 2011). "Let’s Talk Democratic Socialism, Already". In These Times. 
  3. ^ "What Is Democratic Socialism?". Democratic Socialist of America. Retrieved January 10, 2014. 
  4. ^ "Current Campaigns". Democratic Socialists of America. Retrieved January 10, 2014. 
  5. ^ Hunt, E.K. (2002). Property and Prophets: The Evolution of Economic Institutions and Ideologi. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 260–261. 
  6. ^ a b Mitgang, Herbert (August 2, 1989). "Michael Harrington, Socialist and Author, Is Dead".  
  7. ^ John Haer, "Reviving Socialism," Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, May 1, 1982. Retrieved November 9, 2009.
  8. ^ O'Rourke (1993, pp. 195–196):

    O'Rourke, William (1993). "L: Michael Harrington". Signs of the literary times: Essays, reviews, profiles, 1970-1992'. The Margins of Literature (SUNY Series). SUNY Press. pp. 192–196.  

    Originally: O'Rourke, William (13 November 1973). "Michael Harrington: Beyond Watergate, Sixties, and reform". SoHo Weekly News 3 (2): 6–7. 

  9. ^ Mike Davis, Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the US Working Class. London: Verso; pp. 256-260, 275-276.
  10. ^ Manning Marable, Beyond Black and White: Transforming African-American Politics. London: Verso, 1996; pg. 61.
  11. ^ "Where We Stand: The Political Perspective of the Democratic Socialists of America," section 5. Retrieved March 24, 2006.
  12. ^ ""Progressive Groups Issue Report Card on Clinton.", Retrieved November 3, 2008.
  13. ^ "Electoral Politics As Tactic — Elections Statement 2000." Retrieved November 3, 2008.
  14. ^ "Where We Stand — The Political Perspective of the Democratic Socialists of America." Retrieved November 3, 2008.
  15. ^ "DSA PAC Statement on Kerry Campaign," Democratic Left, vol. 32, no. 4 (Fall 2004), pg. 8.
  16. ^ "Convention Resolution: DSA Priorities," Democratic Left, vol. 33 no.3 (Winter 2006), page 4.
  17. ^ Michael Hirsch, "Economic Justice Agenda Adopted," Democratic Left, vol. 35 no.3 (Winter 2008), page 4.
  18. ^ Linkins, Jason (March 8, 2009). "NYT Peppers Obama With Questions About Socialism". Huffington Post. 
  19. ^ Frank Llewellyn and Joseph Schwartz, "Socialists Say: Obama is No Socialist," Chicago Tribune, November 1, 2009. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
  20. ^ a b "Join Us," Retrieved September 26, 2010.
  21. ^ "Change the USA! Join the DSA!" Democratic Left, vol. 37, no. 3 (Winter 2009), page 16.
  22. ^ "Change the USA! Join the DSA!" Democratic Left, vol. 37, no. 3 (Winter 2009), page 3.
  23. ^ Haer, John (May 1, 1982). "Reviving Socialism".  
  24. ^ Oreskes, Michael (December 4, 1987). "Jackson to Shun Socialist Backing".  
  25. ^ Baker, Harlan (October 17, 2002). "Group Accuses Socialists of Voter Fraud".  
  26. ^ "Direct Mail Yields Membership Increase". Democratic Socialists of America. August 6, 2005. Retrieved November 5, 2009. 
  27. ^ "Convention 2003," Democratic Left, vol. 31, no. 3 (Winter 2003-04), pg. 12.
  28. ^ "DSA Constitution and By-laws," Article VIII, Section 2.
  29. ^ "DSA Constitution and By-laws," Article VIII, Section 1.
  30. ^ "DSA Constitution and By-laws," Article VIII, Section 3.
  31. ^ "Talking Union: A Project of the DSA Labor Network". Retrieved November 8, 2009. 
  32. ^ Bella Stumbo, "A Socialist Utopia," Los Angeles Times, April 12, 1987. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
  33. ^ Michael Harrington and Barbara Ehrenreich, "In Spirit of Glasnost, a Half-Toast to Perestroika; U.S. Left Supportive," New York Times, June 16, 1989. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
  34. ^  
  35. ^ a b "What is Democratic Socialism? Questions and Answers from the Democratic Socialists of America". Democratic Socialists of America. Retrieved February 24, 2010. 

Further reading

  • Joel Freedman, "No Enemies on the Left as DSOC and NAM Merge," New America [New York], vol. 18, no. 6 (Nov.-Dec. 1981), pg. 5.

External links

  • DSA official website. —includes PDFs of most issues of Democratic Left published since 2001.
  • Constitution of the DSA. Retrieved February 25, 2010.
  • Young Democratic Socialists official website. —youth affiliate of the DSA.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.