This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate? Excessive Violence Sexual Content Political / Social
Email Address:
Article Id: WHEBN0002432024 Reproduction Date:
Chronological snobbery is the erroneous argument (usually considered an outright fallacy) that the thinking, art or science of an earlier time is inherently inferior to that of the present simply by virtue of its temporal priority. The term was coined by C. S. Lewis and Owen Barfield. As Barfield explains it, it is the belief that "intellectually, humanity languished for countless generations in the most childish errors on all sorts of crucial subjects, until it was redeemed by some simple scientific dictum of the last century".[1] The subject came up between them when Barfield had converted to Anthroposophy and was seeking to get Lewis (an atheist at the time) to join him. One of Lewis's objections was that religion was simply outdated, and in Surprised by Joy (chapter 13, p. 207–208), he describes how this was fallacious:
A manifestation of chronological snobbery is the usage in general of the word "medieval" to mean "backwards".[2]
Logic, Epistemology, Ethics, Metaphysics, Aesthetics
Natural science, Rudolf Steiner, Epistemology, Waldorf education, Spirituality
Latin, Philosophy, Chronological snobbery, Slippery slope, Not invented here
Philosophy, Slippery slope, Informal fallacy, List of fallacies, Straw man
Logic, Aesthetics, Status quo, Philosophy, Appeal to tradition
Ignoratio elenchi, Relevance, Accident (fallacy), Appeal to consequences, Appeal to nature
Latin, The Beatles, Censorship, Water, Soviet Union
Logic, Slippery slope, Philosophy, Rhetoric, Formal fallacy