Crs Report for Congress Received through the Crs Web Protecting Our Perimeter : Border Searches under the Fourth Amendment Updated May 17, 2005

By Vina, Stephen R.

Book Id: WPLBN0000013896
Format Type: PDF eBook:
File Size: 0.1 MB
Reproduction Date: 2008

Title:	Crs Report for Congress Received through the Crs Web Protecting Our Perimeter : Border Searches under the Fourth Amendment Updated May 17, 2005
Author:	Vina, Stephen R.
Volume:
Language:	English
Subject:	Government publications, Legislation., Government Printing Office (U.S.)
Collections:	Government Library Collection
Historic Publication Date:
Publisher:	Government Printing Office


Citation APA MLA Chicago R. Vin, B. S. (n.d.). Crs Report for Congress Received through the Crs Web Protecting Our Perimeter : Border Searches under the Fourth Amendment Updated May 17, 2005. Retrieved from http://gutenberg.us/

Excerpt
Summary: Many border security initiatives were developed after the events of September 11, 2001. Because security initiatives often maintain a search and seizure component, Fourth Amendment implications may arise. The Fourth Amendment establishes that a search or seizure conducted by a governmental agent must be reasonable, and that probable cause support any judicially granted warrant. An invalid “search” is an infringement of an expectation of privacy that society is prepared to consider reasonable. A “seizure” of a person occurs when a government official makes an individual reasonably believe that he or she is not at liberty to ignore the government’s presence in view of all the circumstances surrounding the incident. The Court has interpreted the Fourth Amendment to include a presumptive warrant requirement on all searches and seizures conducted by the government, and has ruled that any violations of this standard will result in the suppression of any information derived there from. The Court, however, has also recognized situations that render the obtainment of a warrant impractical or against the public’s interest, and has accordingly crafted various exceptions to the warrant and probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment.

Table of Contents
Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 The Fourth Amendment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Seizure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Border Searches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Functional Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Extended Border Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 At Sea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Types of Searches and Seizures at the Border . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Routine Searches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Nonroutine Searches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 The 9/11 Commission Recommendations and Legislative Action . . . . . . . 16 The Minuteman Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18