World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Polish–Russian War of 1792

Polish–Russian War of 1792
Part of the Polish–Russian Wars

Polish–Russian War of 1792
Date 18 May – 27 July 1792
Location Centre and eastern parts of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
Result Russian victory, Second Partition of Poland
Belligerents
 Russian Empire
Targowica Confederates
Commonwealth of Poland
Commanders and leaders
Mikhail Krechetnikov
Mikhail Kakhovsky

King Stanisław August Poniatowski
Prince Józef Poniatowski
Tadeusz Kościuszko
Michał Wielhorski
Duke Louis of Württemberg (until 1 June 1792)

Józef Judycki
Strength
98,000 men[1] 37,000[2]
Casualties and losses
Unknown Unknown

The Polish–Russian War of 1792 (also, War of the Second Partition,[3] and in Polish sources, War in Defence of the Constitution (Polish: wojna w obronie Konstytucji 3 maja)[4]) was fought between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth on one side, and the Targowica Confederation (conservative nobility of the Commonwealth opposed to the new Constitution of 3 May 1791) and the Russian Empire under Catherine the Great on the other.[3]

The war took place in two theaters: northern in Lithuania and southern in Ukraine. In both, the Polish forces retreated before the numerically superior Russian forces, though they offered significantly more resistance in the south, thanks to the effective leadership of Polish commanders Prince Józef Poniatowski and Tadeusz Kościuszko. During the three-month-long struggle several battles were fought, but no side scored a decisive victory.[5] The largest success of the Polish forces was the defeat of one of the Russian formations at the Battle of Zieleńce on 18 June; in the aftermath of the battle the Polish highest military award, Virtuti Militari, was established. The war ended when the Polish King Stanisław August Poniatowski decided to seek a diplomatic solution, asked for a ceasefire with the Russians and joined the Targowica Confederation, as demanded by the Russian Empire.[6]

Contents

  • Background 1
    • Decline of the Commonwealth 1.1
    • Attempts at reform 1.2
  • Opposing forces 2
  • War 3
    • Southern theater 3.1
    • Northern theater 3.2
    • War ends 3.3
  • Aftermath 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • Further reading 7

Background

Decline of the Commonwealth

By the early 18th century, the magnates of Poland and Lithuania controlled the state – or rather, they managed to ensure that no reforms would be carried out that might weaken their privileged status (the "Golden Freedoms").[7] Through the abuse of the liberum veto rule which enabled any deputy to paralyze the Sejm (Commonwealth's parliament) proceedings, deputies bribed by magnates or foreign powers or those simply content to believe they were living in an unprecedented "Golden Age", paralysed the Commonwealth's government for over a century.[8][9]

The idea of reforming the Commonwealth gained traction since the mid-17th century;[10] it was however viewed with suspicion not only by its magnates but also by neighboring countries, which had been content with the deterioration of the Commonwealth and abhorred the thought of a resurgent and democratic power on their borders.[11] With the Commonwealth Army reduced to around 16,000, it was easy for its neighbors to intervene directly (The Imperial Russian Army numbered 300,000 troops overall; The Prussian Army and Imperial Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 200,000 each).[12]

Attempts at reform

A major opportunity for reform presented itself during the "Great Sejm" of 1788–92. Poland's neighbors were preoccupied with wars and unable to intervene forcibly in Polish affairs. Russian Empire and Archduchy of Austria were engaged in hostilities with the Ottoman Empire (the Russo–Turkish War, 1787–1792 and the Austro-Turkish War, 1787–1791); the Russians also found themselves simultaneously fighting in the Russo-Swedish War, 1788–1790.[13][14][15][16] A new alliance between the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth and Prussia seeming to provide security against Russian intervention, and on 3 May 1791 the new constitution was read and adopted to overwhelming popular support.[13][17][18][19]

With the wars between Turkey and Russia and Sweden and Russia having ended, Tsarina Catherine was furious over the adoption of the document, which she believed threatened Russian influence in Poland.[15][16][20] Russia had viewed Poland as a de facto protectorate.[21] "The worst possible news have arrived from Warsaw: the Polish king has become almost sovereign" was the reaction of one of Russia's chief foreign policy authors, Alexander Bezborodko, when he learned of the new constitution.[22] The Kingdom of Prussia was also strongly opposed to the new Polish constitution, and Polish diplomats received a note that the new constitution changed the Polish state so much that Prussia did not consider its obligations binding.[23] Just like Russia, Prussia was concerned that the newly strengthened Polish state could became a threat and the Prussian Foreign Minister, Friedrich Wilhelm von Schulenburg-Kehnert, clearly and with rare candor told Poles that Prussia did not support the constitution and refused to help the Commonwealth in any form, even as a mediator, as it was not in Prussia's interest to see the Commonwealth strengthened so that it could threaten Prussia in some future.[23] The Prussian statesman Ewald von Hertzberg expressed the fears of European conservatives: "The Poles have given the coup de grâce to the Prussian monarchy by voting a constitution", elaborating that a strong Commonwealth would likely demand the return of the lands Prussia acquired in the First Partition.[22][24]

The Constitution was not adopted without dissent in the Commonwealth itself, either. Magnates who had opposed the constitution draft from the start, namely Franciszek Ksawery Branicki, Stanisław Szczęsny Potocki, Seweryn Rzewuski, and Szymon and Józef Kossakowski, asked Tsarina Catherine to intervene and restore their privileges such as the Russian-guaranteed Cardinal Laws abolished under the new statute.[19] To that end these magnates formed the Targowica Confederation.[19] The Confederation's proclamation, prepared in St. Petersburg in January 1792, criticized the constitution for contributing to, in their own words, "contagion of democratic ideas" following "the fatal examples set in Paris".[25][26] It asserted that "The parliament ... has broken all fundamental laws, swept away all liberties of the gentry and on the third of May 1791 turned into a revolution and a conspiracy."[27] The Confederates declared an intention to overcome this revolution. We "can do nothing but turn trustingly to Tsarina Catherine, a distinguished and fair empress, our neighboring friend and ally", who "respects the nation's need for well-being and always offers it a helping hand", they wrote.[27] The Confederates aligned with Tsarina Catherine and asked her for military intervention.[19] On 18 May 1792 Russian ambassador to Poland, Yakov Bulgakov, delivered a declaration of war to the Polish Foreign Minister Joachim Chreptowicz.[28] Russian armies entered Poland and Lithuania on the same day, starting the war.[1][19]

Opposing forces

Polish soldiers of 3rd Lithuanian Infantry Regiment in 1792

The Russian army numbered nearly 98,000.[1] It was commanded by generals Mikhail Krechetnikov and Mikhail Kakhovsky.[28] The Russians also had an advantage in combat experience.[1] The Russian plan called for Kakhovsky to advance through Ukraine, taking Kamieniec Podolski, Chełm and Lublin, and approach Polish capital of Warsaw from the south.[29] Krechetnikov was to advance through Minsk, Wilno, Brześć Litewski and Białystok, and approach Warsaw from the north, where he was to link with Kakhovsky.[29] Whereas the Russians had good intelligence network in Poland, and were mostly aware of Polish army distribution and strength; the Poles had much less intelligence, receiving contradictory and often erroneous reports, and unsure whether the war would even start up to the point the Russian troops crossed the border.[29][30]

  • Adam Wolański, Wojna polsko-rosyjska 1792 r, Wydawnictwo Volumen, Warszawa 1996, ISBN 83-85218-48-3
  • Andrzej Grabski et al., Zarys dziejów wojskowości polskiej do roku 1864. Wydawnictwo Ministerstwa Obrony Narodowej. Warszawa 1966.
  • Antoni Juszczyński, Marian Krwawicz, Wypisy źródłowe do historii polskiej sztuki wojennej. Polska sztuka wojenna w latach 1764–1793. Zeszyt dziewiąty. Wydawnictwo Ministerstwa Obrony Narodowej. Warszawa 1957.

Further reading

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. p. 223.  
  2. ^ a b Juliusz Bardach; Boguslaw Lesnodorski; Michal Pietrzak (1987). Historia panstwa i prawa polskiego [History of Polish State and Law] (in Polish). Warsaw: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. p. 317.  
  3. ^ a b Norman Davies (1982). God's Playground, a History of Poland: The origins to 1795. Columbia University Press. p. 535.  
  4. ^ Wojciech Mikuła (1995). ]Zieleńce Dubienka: From the History of the War in Defense of the 3 May Constitution [Zieleńce Dubienka: z dziejów wojny w obronie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Ajaks.  
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. pp. 304–306.  
  6. ^ Jerzy Skowronek (1986). Książę Józef Poniatowski [Prince Józef Poniatowski] (in Polish). Wrocław:  
  7. ^ Norman Davies (30 March 2005). God's Playground: The origins to 1795. Columbia University Press. p. 274.  
  8. ^ Francis Ludwig Carsten (1 January 1961). The new Cambridge modern history: The ascendancy of France, 1648–88. Cambridge University Press. pp. 561–562.  
  9. ^  
  10. ^  
  11. ^ John P. LeDonne (1997). The Russian empire and the world, 1700–1917: the geopolitics of expansion and containment. Oxford University Press. pp. 41–42.  
  12. ^ Krzysztof Bauer (1991). ]Passing and defense of the Constitution of 3 May [Uchwalenie i obrona Konstytucji 3 Maja (in Polish). Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne. p. 9.  
  13. ^ a b  
  14. ^  
  15. ^ a b Robert Bideleux; Ian Jeffries (28 January 1998). A history of eastern Europe: crisis and change. Psychology Press. p. 160.  
  16. ^ a b Jerzy Lukowski (3 August 2010). Disorderly liberty: the political culture of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the eighteenth century. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 226.  
  17. ^  
  18. ^  
  19. ^ a b c d e f g h  
  20. ^  
  21. ^ Jerzy Lukowski; Hubert Zawadzki (2001). A concise history of Poland. Cambridge University Press. p. 84.  
  22. ^ a b Krzysztof Bauer (1991). ]Passing and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Uchwalenie i obrona Konstytucji 3 Maja (in Polish). Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne. p. 16.  
  23. ^ a b Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. pp. 325–326.  
  24. ^ Hon. Carl L. Bucki (3 May 1996). "Constitution Day: May 3, 1791". Polish Academic Information Center. Retrieved 21 September 2008. 
  25. ^ Robert Howard Lord (1915). The second partition of Poland: a study in diplomatic history. Harvard University Press. p. 275.  
  26. ^ a b Michal Kopeček (2006). Discourses of collective identity in Central and Southeast Europe (1770–1945): texts and commentaries. Central European University Press. pp. 282–284.  
  27. ^ a b Michal Kopeček (2006). Discourses of collective identity in Central and Southeast Europe (1770–1945): texts and commentaries. Central European University Press. pp. 284–285.  
  28. ^ a b c d e f Jadwiga Nadzieja (1988). Od Jakobina do księcia namiestnika [From Jacobin to Prince Namestnik] (in Polish). Wydawnictwo "Śląsk". pp. 38–39.  
  29. ^ a b c Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 35–36.  
  30. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 52.  
  31. ^ a b c d Jerzy Skowronek (1986). Książę Józef Poniatowski [Prince Józef Poniatowski] (in Polish). Wrocław:  
  32. ^ Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. p. 298.  
  33. ^ a b Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 51.  
  34. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 55–57, 62.  
  35. ^ a b c Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 97.  
  36. ^ Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. p. 299.  
  37. ^ a b Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. p. 302.  
  38. ^ Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. p. 222.  
  39. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 50.  
  40. ^ a b c Herbst, Stanisław (1969). "Tadeusz Kościuszko".  
  41. ^ a b c Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. p. 224.  
  42. ^ a b Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 58.  
  43. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 63–65.  
  44. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 67.  
  45. ^ Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. p. 225.  
  46. ^ Jerzy Skowronek (1986). Książę Józef Poniatowski [Prince Józef Poniatowski] (in Polish). Wrocław:  
  47. ^ a b c Jerzy Skowronek (1986). Książę Józef Poniatowski [Prince Józef Poniatowski] (in Polish). Wrocław:  
  48. ^ Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. pp. 226–227.  
  49. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 79–83.  
  50. ^ a b Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. pp. 228–229.  
  51. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 95.  
  52. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 98.  
  53. ^ a b c d e Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 98–103.  
  54. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 108.  
  55. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 108–110.  
  56. ^ a b Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 115–116.  
  57. ^ a b Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 117.  
  58. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 118–119.  
  59. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 130.  
  60. ^ Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. p. 231.  
  61. ^ a b c Michalski, Jerzy (2011). "Stanisław August Poniatowski".  
  62. ^ a b c Jerzy Skowronek (1986). Książę Józef Poniatowski [Prince Józef Poniatowski] (in Polish). Wrocław:  
  63. ^ Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. pp. 293–296, 306–307, 318, 418.  
  64. ^ Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 130–131, 144–145.  
  65. ^ Alex Storozynski (January 2011). ]Kosciuszko Prince of Peasants [Kościuszko Książe chłopów (in Polish). W.A.B. pp. 232–233.  
  66. ^ a b c Jerzy Łojek (1986). ]Genesis and Fall of the 3 May Constitution [Geneza i obalenie Konstytucji 3 maja (in Polish). Wydawn. Lubelskie. p. 402.  
  67. ^ a b Piotr Derdej (2008). Zieleńce – Mir – Dubienka 1792 (in Polish). Bellona. p. 160.  
  68. ^ a b c d  
  69. ^ Norman Davies (30 March 2005). God's Playground: The origins to 1795. Columbia University Press. p. 254.  
  70. ^ David Pickus (2001). Dying With an Enlightening Fall: Poland in the Eyes of German Intellectuals, 1764–1800. Lexington Books. p. 118.  
  71. ^ Daniel Stone (2001). The Polish-Lithuanian State: 1386–1795. University of Washington Press. pp. 282–285.  
  72. ^  

References

See also

This outcome came also as a surprise to most of the Targowica Confederates, who had wished only to restore the status quo ante (Commonwealth magnate-favoring Golden Freedoms) and had expected that the overthrow of the 3 May Constitution would achieve that end, and nothing more.[71] The last bid to restore the reformed Commonwealth came with the Kościuszko Uprising in 1794. The uprising failed and resulted in the Third Partition in 1795, in which the country lost all its remaining territories and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ceased to exist.[67][68][72]

King Poniatowski's hopes that the capitulation will allow an acceptable diplomatic solution to be worked out were soon dashed. With new deputies bribed or intimidated by the Russian troops, a new session of parliament, known as the Grodno Sejm, took place, in fall 1793.[19][68] On 23 November 1793, it concluded its deliberations under duress, annulling the constitution and acceding to the Second Partition.[69][70] Russia took 250,000 square kilometres (97,000 sq mi), while Prussia took 58,000 square kilometres (22,000 sq mi) of the Commonwealth's territory.[68] This event reduced Poland's population to only one-third of what it was before the First Partition. The rump state was garrisoned by Russian troops and its independence was strongly curtailed.[19][26][68]

Most Polish historians agree that the Polish capitulation was a mistake both from the military perspective, and the political one.[66] In the realm of military, the Poles had reasonable chances to defend the Vistula river line, and exhaust the Russian invading forces.[66][67] From the political one, showing willingness to fight could have persuaded the partitioning powers that their plan was too costly.[66]

Aftermath

The Polish military was widely dissatisfied with the ceasefire; Kościuszko, Prince Poniatowski and many others would criticize the King's decision and many, including Kościuszko, would resign their commission in the coming weeks.[65] Prince Poniatowski even considered rebelling against his uncle's orders, and even issued orders to bring the King to the army's camp by force if necessary, as was postulated by the more radical faction. Ultimately he decided not to continue fighting against his uncle's will, and the order was rescinded at the last moment before the departure of the group charged with capturing the King.[62]

At the time King Poniatowski decided to sue for peace, the Polish army was still in good fighting condition, not suffering from any major defeat nor from lack of supplies. King Poniatowski thought that due to Russian numerical superiority defeat was nonetheless imminent, and more could be gained through negotiations with the Russians, with whom he hoped a new alliance could be formed. Although subsequent events would prove him wrong, the question of whether this could have been foreseen, and prevented through continued military resistance, has been subject to much debate among historians.[19][61][63][64]

While Prince Poniatowski and Kościuszko considered the outcome of the war still open, and were planning to use the combined Polish-Lithuanian forces to defeat the still separate Russian forces,[59] King Poniatowski, with the consent of the Guardians of the Laws (cabinet of ministers) decided to ask for a ceasefire.[60][61] Tsarina Catherine demanded that the King Poniatowski joins the pro-Russian aristocratic faction, the Targowica Confederation; with his cabinet split, he gave in to her demand around 22–23 July, which effectively forced Prince Poniatowski to terminate military resistance.[61][62] The last military confrontation of the war was fought on 26 July at Markuszów in Lublin province, where an enemy attack was repelled by Polish cavalry led by Poniatowski.[62]

War ends

Thus the Army of Lithuania did little to oppose the advancing Russians, and kept withdrawing before their advance.[5][53] Minsk was abandoned, after some skirmishes, on 31 May.[53] Only after a change of commander on 4 June, did the Army, now under General Józef Judycki, try to stand and fight the Russians.[5][53] The Russians however defeated Judycki at the battle of Mir on 11 June and kept advancing through the Grand Duchy.[5] The Commonwealth army retreated towards Grodno.[54] On 14 June the Russians took Wilno, after only a small skirmish with local garrison; on 19 June, incompetently defended Nieśwież; and on 20 June, Kaunas, this time without any opposition.[55] Judycki, disgraced, was replaced by Michał Zabiełło on 23 June.[5] Nonetheless, since Mir, no decisive engagements occurred in the northern theater, as Polish army withdrew in relative order towards Warsaw, after minor defeat at Zelwa,[56] eventually taking defensive positions along the Bug river near Brest.[5][57] Russians took Grodno on 5 July[56] and Białystok on 17 July.[57] On 23 July the Russians took Brest, defeating the local garrison, but on 24 they were defeated near Krzemień-Wieś; this last battle was the first significant Commonwealth victory on the northern front.[58]

In the Grand Duchy of Lithuania the Russians crossed the Commonwealth border four days later than in the south, on 22 May.[52] Poland's ally, the Kingdom of Prussia, broke its alliance with Poland and the Prussian commander of the Lithuanian army, Duke Württemberg, betrayed the Polish-Lithuanian cause by refusing to fight the Russians.[5][53] He never reached the frontlines, feinted illness in Wołczyn, and issued contradictory orders to his troops.[53]

Northern theater

The Russian forces, however, kept advancing. The Polish army, under the command of Józef Poniatowski, was still retreating in order, yielding to the more powerful enemy as necessary to avoid annihilation, according to the Prince's judgement.[47] In early July, near Dubno, Prince Poniatowski and Kościuszko were betrayed by Michał Lubomirski, who was tasked with King Poniatowski with resupplying the troops; instead Lubomirski joined the Russian side, and either hid the supplies for the Polish army, or outright passed them to the Russians.[42][48] Lubomirski, however, was a powerful magnate, and it took until late May for the King to officially relieve him of his command.[49] Within about a month of the Russian invasion, the Poles have mostly retreated from Ukraine.[41] On 7 July Kościuszko's forces fought a delaying battle with the Russians at Volodymyr-Volynskyi (Battle of Włodzimierz).[40] Meanwhile, Poniatowski's army retreated to the Bug River, where Kościuszko's units fought the Battle of Dubienka on 18 July to a draw.[47] With about 5,300 troops Kościuszko defeated the attack of 25,000 Russians under General Michail Kachovski.[50] Kośicuszko then had to retreat from Dubienka, as the Russians begun flanking his positions crossing the nearby Austrian border.[50] Although the Poles had to retreat from the Bug River line, they were not defeated so far, and a decisive battle or battles at more favorable locations closer to Warsaw were expected.[47][51]

On 14 June Wielhorski's unit was defeated at the Battle of Boruszkowce.[43] On 17 June Poniatowski finally received awaited reinforcements, about 2,000 troops led by Michał Lubomirski.[44] Next day the Poles, led by Prince Poniatowski, defeated one of the Russian formations of general Irakly Morkov at the Battle of Zieleńce on 18 June.[41][45] The victory was celebrated by King Poniatowski, who sent the new Virtuti Militari medals for the campaign leaders and soldiers, as "the first since John III Sobieski".[46]

First Russian forces crossed the border in Ukraine on the night of 18/19 May 1792.[1][39] The Russians in that theater would encounter significantly more resistance than they expected, as Commonwealth's top commanders, Prince Poniatowski and Kościuszko were stationed there.[1] Kościuszko joined Prince Poniatowski near Janów on 29 May.[40] The Crown Army was judged too weak to oppose the four columns of enemy armies advancing into West Ukraine and began a fighting withdrawal to the western side of the Southern Bug River, towards Lubar and Połonne, with Kośiuszko commanding the rear guard.[40][41] Poniatowski, in face of a significant numerical inferiority of his forces, and promised reinforcements by King Poniatowski, decided to abandon Ukraine and move to Volhynia, where Połonne was to be fortified as a major defensive point, and where Lubomirski was tasked with gathering supplies.[42]

Southern theater

War

Tadeusz Kościuszko proposed a plan where the entire Polish army would be concentrated and would engage one of the Russian armies, in order to assure numerical parity and to boost the morale of mostly inexperienced Polish forces with a quick victory; this plan was however rejected by Prince Poniatowski.[1] (Only a few months ago, however, both commanders had the opposite idea – Poniatowski wanted the troops concentrated, and Kościuszko, dispersed).[1][38] Poniatowski also planned to avoid serious engagements in the first phase of the war, hoping to receive the expected Prussian reinforcements of 30,000 which would bring parity to the two sides.[37]

Additional Polish forces, about 8,000 strong, were to concentrate in Warsaw under command of King Poniatowski as reserve.[37]

In Lithuania, Commonwealth Lithuanian Army numbered about 15,000, with an additional Crown detachment of about 3,000.[35] They were commanded by Duke Louis of Württemberg.[28] Württemberg made no plans for the war, and the troops were not readied for action by the time the war started.[28] The Russian army in that theatre under General Mikhail Krechetnikov was 33,700 strong[36] or 38,000 strong.[35] The Russian army was also divided into four corps: 1st under one of Targowica Confederate leaders, Szymon Kossakowski 7,300 strong, 2nd under General Boris Mellin, 7,000 strong, 3rd under General Yuri Dolgorukov, 15,400 strong, and 4th under General Ivan Fersen, 8,300 strong.[35]

In the southeast corner of the country – the Ukrainian lands – the Polish forces were initially concentrated separately in three regions of the expected front, under Tadeusz Kościuszko, Michał Wielhorski and Prince Poniatowski himself.[31] The Polish Crown army in Ukraine, led by Prince Poniatowski, and supported by Kościuszko, was about 17,000,[1] 21,000[32] or 24,000[31] strong (Derdej distinguishes between the primary force of 17,000 and Prince Michał Lubomirski's reserve division, of 4,500[33]). They were faced on this southeastern war theater with a nearly four times larger enemy army under General Mikhail Kakhovsky, who had about 64,000 men under his command.[1][31] Kakhovsky's forces were divided into four corps: 1st, 17,000 strong, under the command of General Mikhail Golenishchev-Kutuzov, 2nd, under General Ivan Dunin, 3rd, under General Otto Wilhelm Derfelden, and 4th, under General Andrei Levanidov.[33] The Targowica Confederates did not represent any real strength; and their attempts to gather popular support in Poland upon crossing borders failed miserably, with only few dozens joining at first; later the number would grow but not significantly, and even the Russians saw them as not having any military value, keeping them from frontlines.[34]

[28]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.