Judiciary of Thailand

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Thailand

The Judiciary of Thailand (2007 Constitution of Thailand.

The Asian Human Rights Commission called the Thai legal system a "mess" and called for a drastic overhaul of Thailand's criminal procedures. It cited the rampant use of forced confessions, and the fact that even a senior justice ministry official admitted that 30% of cases went to court with no evidence. There are no stenographic records kept by the trial court and the record is composed of what the judges decide. It also criticized the judiciary for failing to ensure that trials are conducted speedily.[1]

Research judges assist the sitting judges. Judges must take an examination and two different examinations are given: one exam is for judges trained in Thailand and a different examination is given for judges who graduate from foreign law schools. All Judges are formally appointed by the King.

Contents

  • Courts of Justice 1
  • The Administrative Courts 2
  • The Constitutional Court 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Courts of Justice

The Courts of Justice of Thailand (ศาลยุติธรรม) is the largest of the court system and makes up the majority of courts in the Kingdom. The Courts as mandated in the Constitution is made up of three tiers: the Court of First Instance (ศาลชั้นต้น), the Court of Appeals (ศาลอุทธรณ์) and the Supreme Court of Justice of Thailand (ศาลฎีกา). The current Chief Justice of Thailand is Direk Ingkaninanda.

The Administrative Courts

The Administrative Court system (ศาลปกครอง) is made up of two tiers: The Administrative Courts of First Instance (ศาลปกครองชั้นต้น) and the Supreme Administrative Court (ศาลปกครองสูงสุด). The court system was first created in 1997, the court’s main jurisdiction is to settle litigation between the State or an organ of state (government ministries, departments and independent agencies) and private citizens.

The Constitutional Court

First set up in 1997, the Constitutional Court of Thailand (ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ) was created solely as a high court to settle matters pertaining to the constitution. The court has since accumulated huge amounts of power and influence in the wake of the 2006 military coup and the constitution it created, engaging in what critics of the Court call political coups, ousting prime ministers from office, and climaxing in a ruling in 2013 that Parliament could not amend the constitution according to its terms to elect all senators because that would violate the court's definition of a "democratic regime." In May 2014, the Constitutional Court ruled that the Thai prime minister and nine other cabinet minister had to resign because of malfeasance. Questions have been raised not only over the court's increasing power over this matter, but why the Supreme Court, which apparently has jurisdiction in such cases, did not adjudicate. There have been repeated calls for reform or outright elimination of the Court because of its politicization.

See also

References

  1. ^ M&C, Human rights group slams Thailand's judicial system, 26 March 2007

External links

  • Official Website of the Supreme Court of Justice of Thailand
  • Official Website of the Supreme Administrative Court of Thailand
  • Official Website of the Constitutional Court of Thailand
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.